I really have no intention of making this a blog about nothing but abortion and vaccines, regardless of the trend with recent posts! As the masthead says, the primary purpose is to promote discussion about freedom in decision-making around vaccination.
But there is yet another similarity between abortion and vaccines: both procedures center around the selling of bodies and lives - as well as their destruction, though of the two abortion is far more effective and efficient.
In the summer of 2015 David Daleiden of the Center for Medical Progress released a series of videos documenting Planned Parenthood's practice of selling body parts from aborted children as an adjunctive profit center.
At least they (theoretically) obtained the consent of the mother's of these children - I doubt they offered them a discount, though!
In much the same way, our bodies (both our children, and increasingly, adults) are likewise for sale - to the makers of vaccines, as well as to those who advocate for vaccination. The presence of conflicts of interest among those who legislate for vaccine mandates (CA State Senator Dr. Richard Pan, for example) is not hard to find. Click here for an article that discusses his "support" from pharmaceutical companies as well as several other examples of conflict of interest.
Merck, the maker of Gardasil, was initially very heavily involved in fomenting states to mandate use of Gardasil - a strategy that may have backfired. To be sure, they "lobbied" the end-users with TV commercials as well. But that is just icing on the cake, since those targeted for vaccination increasingly do not have any choice in the matter.
Physicians make money from vaccinations - both from visits to provide them as well as from bonuses they may be eligible for if a high percentage of their patients are vaccinated.
Money talks, bonuses work.
Flu vaccines are mandated for healthcare workers in hospitals. The hospitals can be docked Medicare payments for failing to report the percentage of staff who have been vaccinated against influenza.
Whether dead or alive, we are being sold. Either our bodies are the product being pedaled to research companies (fetal tissue) or we are being offered to vaccine makers as a recipient of their product regardless of whether we want it or not - and money is greasing the pockets of others for this priviledge of making a profit off of us.
Given legitimate questions surrounding vaccine safety and efficacy (detailed on this and many other blogs) - it is reasonable to expect a high degree of freedom regarding the use of vaccination. Even if they were 100% effective and 100% safe there should be a high degree of freedom as human beings are designed to live in freedom, and competent adults are not wards of the state.
A blog to discuss vaccines, and to promote personal choice in the decision to accept, or decline vaccination.
Sunday, October 30, 2016
Tuesday, October 25, 2016
Back-Alley Vaccines (Vaccines and Abortion, Part 7)
One of the justifications for keeping abortion legal is that doing so makes it safe(r) - at least for women (as the purpose of abortion is to end the unborn baby's life). After all, if abortion were not legal women would resort to coat-hangers in desperate attempts to rid themselves of their unborn children.
While some women did do this sort of thing prior to the "legalization" of abortion through judicial diktat we can only speculate about how many actually did - or about how many would do such a thing if abortion were ever again made illegal. We do not know how many women were hurt from "back alley butchers" prior to the legalization of abortion - and, in fact, those who advocated for the legalization fo abortion made up numbers (they lied) in order to persuade law-makers and others about the "need" for legalization.
Even though abortion was illegal, doctors committed abortion - they were just quiet about it.
Any competent OB/GYN can do a 1rst trimester abortion - this is just a D&C on a baby that is still alive and would remain so if he/she was left undisturbed. These abortions took place in doctors offices and hospitals - places that were clean and where the care was competant - in other words, not the "back-alley".
Fast forward to today, where Gosnell is not an anomalie. Those who love abortion do not want any accountability - a situation where Gosnells flourish. The only way anyone would know about this sort of thing is because someone looks. One would think that with all their concern for "women's health" the pro-aborts would be all over every abortionist to hold them to high standards - alas this is not the case. It is the pro-lifers who are alerting us to problems as they stand outside of clinics and watch the ambulances come to scoop up the dead, dying, or damaged women. And since there are not pro-lifers outside of every clinic it would be safe to say the count is under-reported (kind of like vaccine adverse reactions).
There is no compulsion to report abortion complications, and what abortionist would admit their procedure hurt someone (well, other than the baby)? Why, that would be bad for business!
Yet we really do not know that legal abortion is safer than the "illegal" abortions that were happening prior to Roe v Wade.
While there is, in theory, a "compulsion" to report vaccine adverse events or injuries, the reality is that reporting such things is voluntary, and widely believed to be very under-reported (like complications of abortions).
While you would expect those who are pro-vaccine to be all about making vaccines safer, the fact of the matter is that there is virtually no incentive to do so since the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act which created total immunity against any adverse effects from vaccines for anyone associated with them - companies, healthcare providers, etc. So they are about as pro-vaccine safety as abortionists are pro-women's (and unborn persons) health. Since there is no accountability for either group there is no incentive for safety.
While there is, in theory, a "compulsion" to report vaccine adverse events or injuries, the reality is that reporting such things is voluntary, and widely believed to be very under-reported (like complications of abortions).
While you would expect those who are pro-vaccine to be all about making vaccines safer, the fact of the matter is that there is virtually no incentive to do so since the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act which created total immunity against any adverse effects from vaccines for anyone associated with them - companies, healthcare providers, etc. So they are about as pro-vaccine safety as abortionists are pro-women's (and unborn persons) health. Since there is no accountability for either group there is no incentive for safety.
Women (and our unborn babies) deserve better than abortion.
All of us deserve better than vaccine mandates.
All of us deserve better than vaccine mandates.
Part 1 - The irony of "choice"
Part 2 - DNA from aborted babies
Part 3 - Vaccines as abortifacients
Part 4 - "My body, my choice"?
Part 5 - Coercion/manipulation, abortion/vaccines
Part 6 - Secret recordings, abortion/vaccines
Saturday, October 15, 2016
Live Blog: #cdcTRUTH2016 Summit/Dr. Brian Hooker
Dr. Hooker is the father of a vaccine injured son and captured Dr. Thompson's confession of fraud in the 2004 study that presumably refutes the "vaccines cause autism" issue.
Like many, he was totally pro-vaccine, and like many, he has changed his views.
NAS/IOM - client based scientists for hire. They do post-normal science where outcome is pre-determined.
Over 100 papers linking vaccines and autism.
He links vaccination and eugenics.
He acknowledges he was not necessarily gracious in his initial dealings with Dr Thompson
(2002?) who was assigned to handle him. (Remember, this is a daddy looking for answers for his hurt child).
CDC - culture of fear and intimidation per Dr Thompson...one unnamed scientist was put on two year suspension, demoted etc for not towing the party line.
Good news: recognition that vaccine injury is far more than autism is growing.
Dr. Bill Thompson needs to man up! He does not need a subpoena!!
Like many, he was totally pro-vaccine, and like many, he has changed his views.
NAS/IOM - client based scientists for hire. They do post-normal science where outcome is pre-determined.
Over 100 papers linking vaccines and autism.
He links vaccination and eugenics.
He acknowledges he was not necessarily gracious in his initial dealings with Dr Thompson
(2002?) who was assigned to handle him. (Remember, this is a daddy looking for answers for his hurt child).
CDC - culture of fear and intimidation per Dr Thompson...one unnamed scientist was put on two year suspension, demoted etc for not towing the party line.
Good news: recognition that vaccine injury is far more than autism is growing.
Dr. Bill Thompson needs to man up! He does not need a subpoena!!
Live Blog: #cdcTRUTH2016 Summit/Meryl Dorey
Ms. Dorey's talk is titled - Medical Tyranny: Vaccination Policy in Australia. It is a preview of what is coming in the USA.
She was relieved to come here to discuss this as freedom of speech is not guaranteed by the Australian constitution.
There is a vaccine registry. This will be used to track and punish anyone who does not comply with vaccination policy (cradle to grave). Vaccination may be linked to employment as well as drivers license among other issues.
The vaccine adverse reaction registry does exist but it is not easily accessible nor transparent.
Look up journalist Natasha Bita and her coverage of flu vaccine scandal.
She shared info showing a rise in pertussis AFTER there was a significant increase in vaccination for pertussis (no doubt all the fault of unvac'd even though they had achieved "herd immunity")
Bio-Security Act of 2015 - the recent CDC rule is no different.
I like how she ended her remarks - while govt officials try to scare us that an epidemic is only a plane ride away, support for human rights is only an email or phone call or website away!
She was relieved to come here to discuss this as freedom of speech is not guaranteed by the Australian constitution.
There is a vaccine registry. This will be used to track and punish anyone who does not comply with vaccination policy (cradle to grave). Vaccination may be linked to employment as well as drivers license among other issues.
The vaccine adverse reaction registry does exist but it is not easily accessible nor transparent.
Look up journalist Natasha Bita and her coverage of flu vaccine scandal.
She shared info showing a rise in pertussis AFTER there was a significant increase in vaccination for pertussis (no doubt all the fault of unvac'd even though they had achieved "herd immunity")
Bio-Security Act of 2015 - the recent CDC rule is no different.
I like how she ended her remarks - while govt officials try to scare us that an epidemic is only a plane ride away, support for human rights is only an email or phone call or website away!
Live Blog: #cdcTRUTH2016/Forrest Mauraudy
Forest Mauraudy is now speaking - he is the man behind a series of fabulous You Tube vids - I encourage you to consider his "incredible opinion"!
I apologize for mis-spellings ... I will correct them later, I am doing this from my phone.
Live Blog: #cdcTRUTH2016 Summit/Marcella Piper-Terry
The title of Marcella's talk is:
The legislator in this slide needs to be respectfully and loving educated.
Here is a You Tube vid of this presentation (updated Oct 18, 2016):
Pro Life? You can't be pro-vaccine.
But she is covering a wider-range of topics (no surprise)! Her points are always referenced and I expect she'll be tying it together shortly.
She stated at the beginning of her presentation that she will make her slides available. I will post a link here as soon as I can (updated Oct 18, 2016 - see below).
The legislator in this slide needs to be respectfully and loving educated.
Here is a You Tube vid of this presentation (updated Oct 18, 2016):
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)