Because there is conflicting research regarding vaccines (pro and con) I think the decision to vaccinate (or not) should be voluntary - the link below (#1) is a re-blog/re-post of an article and it makes the case against coercive vaccination policies not from a clinical standpoint, but from a personal freedom/autonomy standpoint. Interestingly enough, the writer of this piece confesses that he is pro-vaccination and wishes all would get vaccinated!
The second link is from 1997 - testimony of Barbara Loe Fisher before the National Vaccine Advisory Committee in which she raises important points that are still relevant - about informed consent and ethics and the Nuremburg Code, among others ...
The third link is to a post from a cardiologist who argues for greater freedom in vaccine decision making ... I don't agree with all of his points, especially how he ends his piece, but he makes relevant points throughout - and he is likewise, overall pro-vaccine in spite of his case that there could be far more freedom in a person's decision to accept, or decline vaccines.
#1)
http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/vaccination-free-choice
#2)
http://www.nvic.org/informed-consent.aspx
#3) http://medcitynews.com/2013/12/vaccines-middle-ground-room-questions/
A blog to discuss vaccines, and to promote personal choice in the decision to accept, or decline vaccination.
These are treasure for vaccines and very helpful. And as the development of our drug service. I think scientists will find out more about the healthy researches such as vaccines.
ReplyDeleteI don't entirely understand your comment but thank you for reading!
Delete